ADVERTISEMENT
U.S. Rep. John Larson has filed articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, accusing him of war crimes and other violations tied to presidential authority.
“Through his serial usurpation of the congressional war power and commission of murder, war crimes and piracy, Donald J. Trump has acted contrary to his trust as president,” the resolution states.
It adds that his actions are “subversive of constitutional government” and harmful to the American people.
The measure has not gained traction beyond its referral to committee, according to the Congressional Record.
White House spokesman Davis Ingle dismissed the move, calling it “pathetic,” he said.
The resolution comes amid escalating rhetoric surrounding Iran.
Larson said the impeachment effort is aimed at removing the president from office, arguing the administration’s actions risk American lives.
In a separate statement, Larson called on Congress to act, citing constitutional limits on presidential war powers. “Congress cannot let any leader assert that he is above the Constitution,” he said. “Article I makes it clear that he must come before Congress to authorize acts of war,” he said.
U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy also weighed in, calling for the invocation of the 25th Amendment, which outlines a process to remove a president from office. Larson echoed that call, urging the Cabinet to consider that option.
Political analyst Scott McLean, a professor at Quinnipiac University, said impeachment efforts often reflect pressure from party bases. “Their own base … demanded it,” McLean said, referring to past impeachment efforts against Trump.
Trump was impeached twice during his first term but was acquitted both times by the Senate. Any new impeachment effort would face a similar hurdle, requiring Senate conviction to remove a president from office.
“The president of the United States is unstable … and a danger to our country,” Bronin said. “I’m glad that Congressman Larson has joined me in calling for his removal,” he said.
The resolution now sits in committee with no clear path forward.
ADVERTISEMENT